I would LOVE to build an open-source value-stream map for several legal processes! What a great idea! So far it has been observational and intuitive to say that e-discovery is rife with waste and value-denied, but let’s pin it down … Continue reading →
Posted in Dialexica, EDRM critique, Related : Lean Lawyering
|
Tagged Business, e-discovery, Inventory, Lean manufacturing, Lean software development, Supply chain management, Technology, The Lean Lawyer, Value stream mapping
|
This probably sums up the EDRM in one elegant line. The issue is pervasive influence, money and term confusion. Perhaps, it’s a good thing that everyone professes to be in love with the the EDRM,–it means that they are invested … Continue reading →
This is a long comment left on The Posse List blog tonight. I figured it was time to put some meat on the bones. It concerns the new framework outlined by Judge John M. Facciola and Jonathan M. Redgrave, Esq. … Continue reading →
Posted in EDRM critique, Guiding Light, Litigation Planning, Reading Material, Resources, Scrum, Transition to Agile, Waterfall in Law
|
Tagged Agile Manifesto, Agile Modeling, Agile software development, counsel, Facciola-Redgrave Framework, John M. Facciola, Jonathan M. Redgrave, keyword/concept search, law firms, law review article, Management, New Year's Day, Project management, Scrum, software, software development, Software development process, Software project management, software vendors, Technology/Internet, the Federal Courts Law Review, XP, YouTube Inc
|
Last post before heading off to talk about Scrum at the ScrumGathering. Found this post, and had to respond because I am truly grateful for the questions and concerns raised by this post! BTW, the Litigation Ecosystem Framework will be … Continue reading →
Posted in Agile 5Ps, Dialexica, EDRM critique, Scrum, Transition to Agile
|
Tagged A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, e-discovery, hand-off systems, Natural Disaster, PMI, Project management, Project manager, Scrum, software development, Software development process
|
The EDRM has been a strong model for the early attempts to deal with ESI. The problem is that once you look at the way it has been implemented and codified, you realize that it just doesn’t work. OK, I … Continue reading →
Posted in Dialexica, EDRM critique
|
Tagged A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Agile software development, consultant, data sets, Discovery, ediscovery, EDRM critique, ESI, Kate Bush, Management, PMBOK, PMI, Project management, Scrum, Software project management, statistical algorithms, Time management
|
This is the beginning of, and an index to, a series of public critiques of the Socha Gelbman The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM). While it takes a bit of negative energy to describe what is wrong with the EDRM, … Continue reading →
Posted in Agile 5Ps, Dialexica, EDRM critique, Guiding Light, Transition to Agile
|
Tagged agile, Agile Lawyers Association, Agile software development, Collaboration, Discovery, ediscovery, EDRM critique, law school, law schools, lawyer, Legal ethics, legal services, litigation, Litigation Processes, malpractice insurance rates, Mediation, Munich, practices, procedures, processes, Project management, Project Management Institute, Project manager, Re-Engineer, risk management, Scrum, Untrained Project Manager
|
