<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Rosetta Brief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dialexica.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Rosetta Brief : Translating Agile for Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s build a legal value stream map! by Steven Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2010/01/lets-build-a-legal-value-stream-map/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=432#comment-17</guid>
		<description>You might want to consider Geoffrey Moore&#039;s Core/Context thinking here first, for the insight it provides into _why_ electronic discovery is so rife with the Seven Wastes. Moore points out that often one party&#039;s Context (commodity stuff, to oversimplify) is another&#039;s Core. There are so many people in the e-discovery world making a good living on turning what should be Context into Core -- in-house, at firms, at vendors, overseas, etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Normally VSM maps the value to the customer (client). However, an alternative form maps the value that the various parties _derive_ from the work, or from performing the work. We&#039;ll make no headway on these wastes, I fear, until it&#039;s clear whose ox is gored at each stage. (VSM is strongest, or at least has a proven history, when the work is done within a single entity that allows the value to be fully traced.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Holding up the two VSMs together will provide additional insight into the underlying problem, which is that lots of people see as food what the client might objectively label &quot;waste.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  -- Steven B. Levy&lt;br&gt;     Author, &quot;Legal Project Management: Control Costs, Meet Schedules, Manage Risks, and Maintain Sanity&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to consider Geoffrey Moore&#39;s Core/Context thinking here first, for the insight it provides into _why_ electronic discovery is so rife with the Seven Wastes. Moore points out that often one party&#39;s Context (commodity stuff, to oversimplify) is another&#39;s Core. There are so many people in the e-discovery world making a good living on turning what should be Context into Core &#8212; in-house, at firms, at vendors, overseas, etc. </p>
<p>Normally VSM maps the value to the customer (client). However, an alternative form maps the value that the various parties _derive_ from the work, or from performing the work. We&#39;ll make no headway on these wastes, I fear, until it&#39;s clear whose ox is gored at each stage. (VSM is strongest, or at least has a proven history, when the work is done within a single entity that allows the value to be fully traced.)</p>
<p>Holding up the two VSMs together will provide additional insight into the underlying problem, which is that lots of people see as food what the client might objectively label &#8220;waste.&#8221; </p>
<p>  &#8212; Steven B. Levy<br />     Author, &#8220;Legal Project Management: Control Costs, Meet Schedules, Manage Risks, and Maintain Sanity&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s build a legal value stream map! by Steven Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2010/01/lets-build-a-legal-value-stream-map/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=432#comment-14</guid>
		<description>You might want to consider Geoffrey Moore&#039;s Core/Context thinking here first, for the insight it provides into _why_ electronic discovery is so rife with the Seven Wastes. Moore points out that often one party&#039;s Context (commodity stuff, to oversimplify) is another&#039;s Core. There are so many people in the e-discovery world making a good living on turning what should be Context into Core -- in-house, at firms, at vendors, overseas, etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Normally VSM maps the value to the customer (client). However, an alternative form maps the value that the various parties _derive_ from the work, or from performing the work. We&#039;ll make no headway on these wastes, I fear, until it&#039;s clear whose ox is gored at each stage. (VSM is strongest, or at least has a proven history, when the work is done within a single entity that allows the value to be fully traced.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Holding up the two VSMs together will provide additional insight into the underlying problem, which is that lots of people see as food what the client might objectively label &quot;waste.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  -- Steven B. Levy&lt;br&gt;     Author, &quot;Legal Project Management: Control Costs, Meet Schedules, Manage Risks, and Maintain Sanity&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to consider Geoffrey Moore&#39;s Core/Context thinking here first, for the insight it provides into _why_ electronic discovery is so rife with the Seven Wastes. Moore points out that often one party&#39;s Context (commodity stuff, to oversimplify) is another&#39;s Core. There are so many people in the e-discovery world making a good living on turning what should be Context into Core &#8212; in-house, at firms, at vendors, overseas, etc. </p>
<p>Normally VSM maps the value to the customer (client). However, an alternative form maps the value that the various parties _derive_ from the work, or from performing the work. We&#39;ll make no headway on these wastes, I fear, until it&#39;s clear whose ox is gored at each stage. (VSM is strongest, or at least has a proven history, when the work is done within a single entity that allows the value to be fully traced.)</p>
<p>Holding up the two VSMs together will provide additional insight into the underlying problem, which is that lots of people see as food what the client might objectively label &#8220;waste.&#8221; </p>
<p>  &#8212; Steven B. Levy<br />     Author, &#8220;Legal Project Management: Control Costs, Meet Schedules, Manage Risks, and Maintain Sanity&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Big Hurdle by clintonkeith</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2010/01/the-big-hurdle/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>clintonkeith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=419#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Fascinating stuff.  Have you tried creating a value stream map to look for opportunities to eliminate waste?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating stuff.  Have you tried creating a value stream map to look for opportunities to eliminate waste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Big Hurdle by clintonkeith</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2010/01/the-big-hurdle/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>clintonkeith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=419#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Fascinating stuff.  Have you tried creating a value stream map to look for opportunities to eliminate waste?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating stuff.  Have you tried creating a value stream map to look for opportunities to eliminate waste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories by Valuable Internet Information &#187; Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories » The Rosetta Brief</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2009/12/lawyers-customer-service-and-user-stories/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Valuable Internet Information &#187; Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories » The Rosetta Brief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=335#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] More here:  Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories » The Rosetta Brief [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More here:  Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories » The Rosetta Brief [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories by Tweets that mention Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories » The Rosetta Brief -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2009/12/lawyers-customer-service-and-user-stories/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories » The Rosetta Brief -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=335#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Agile Lawyers Assn, Agile Lawyer and Dialexica 1, Dialexica. Dialexica said: &quot;Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories&quot; http://ow.ly/Qep3 #agile #law #lawyer #customer #satisfaction #gartner #altmanweil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Agile Lawyers Assn, Agile Lawyer and Dialexica 1, Dialexica. Dialexica said: &quot;Lawyers, Customer Service and User Stories&quot; <a href="http://ow.ly/Qep3" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/Qep3</a> #agile #law #lawyer #customer #satisfaction #gartner #altmanweil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Agile is like tuna&#8230; by Tweets that mention Agile is like tuna… » The Rosetta Brief -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2009/11/agile-is-like-tuna/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Agile is like tuna… » The Rosetta Brief -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=243#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Regina Mullen, Agile Lawyer and Legal Data Services, Dialexica 1. Dialexica 1 said: Part I of &quot;Agile is like tuna...&quot; http://bit.ly/37buBo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Regina Mullen, Agile Lawyer and Legal Data Services, Dialexica 1. Dialexica 1 said: Part I of &quot;Agile is like tuna&#8230;&quot; <a href="http://bit.ly/37buBo" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/37buBo</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EDRM Critique : From Hand-off to Collaborative Culture by e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electronic Discovery, EDiscovery, E-Discovery, Legal Discovery</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2009/09/edrm-critique-from-hand-off-to-collaborative-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electronic Discovery, EDiscovery, E-Discovery, Legal Discovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=113#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] the much lauded EDRM model will gain traction, as practitioners strive to find an even better, and perhaps more practical, project management framework, in many cases acknowledging the role that the EDRM has taken in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the much lauded EDRM model will gain traction, as practitioners strive to find an even better, and perhaps more practical, project management framework, in many cases acknowledging the role that the EDRM has taken in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transition to MediaTemple by Transition to MediaTemple &#124; ShareFavorite</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2009/10/transition-to-mediatemple/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Transition to MediaTemple &#124; ShareFavorite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=179#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] from:  Transition to MediaTemple       Related [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from:  Transition to MediaTemple       Related [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EDRM Critique : From Hand-off to Collaborative Culture by Which PM Methodology is the &#8220;Right One&#8221; for Your EDD Project? &#171; Electronic Discovery Project Management</title>
		<link>http://www.dialexica.com/blog/2009/09/edrm-critique-from-hand-off-to-collaborative-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Which PM Methodology is the &#8220;Right One&#8221; for Your EDD Project? &#171; Electronic Discovery Project Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dialexica.com/blog/?p=113#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] of role or power-based&#8230; the success of the team is the focus &#8230; I recently came across a good argument for why Agile project management might be the next &#8220;big thing&#8221; in e-discovery project [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of role or power-based&#8230; the success of the team is the focus &#8230; I recently came across a good argument for why Agile project management might be the next &#8220;big thing&#8221; in e-discovery project [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
