Looking today at “Occam’s Razor,” from which we get the idea that the more assumptions one makes, the more room there is for error. Therefore, the simpler and fewer the assumptions, the less room for error. Lawyers would do well … Continue reading →
The EDRM has been a strong model for the early attempts to deal with ESI. The problem is that once you look at the way it has been implemented and codified, you realize that it just doesn’t work. OK, I … Continue reading →
Posted in Dialexica, EDRM critique
|
Tagged A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Agile software development, consultant, data sets, Discovery, ediscovery, EDRM critique, ESI, Kate Bush, Management, PMBOK, PMI, Project management, Scrum, Software project management, statistical algorithms, Time management
|
Came across this wonderful statement by VersionOne of the difference between PMI-style project management and Agile. And, it gives us a great chance to introduce the Dialexica “Litigation Ecosystem Framework.” The “Litigation Ecosystem Framework,” is the way we describe the … Continue reading →
Posted in Classification, Litigation Planning, Task Estimation, Transition to Agile
|
Tagged agile, arbitrator, Attorney at law, Discovery, Dispute resolution, dispute resolution system owner, e-discovery, Electronic discovery, judge, Legal procedure, Motion, Project management, Project manager, Risk, Tobacco, Uncertainty
|
E-Discovery budgeting is an interesting issue, one which rarely includes a frank discussion of quality. “Quality” is defined as the ability to satisfy the customer’s primary business objectives at a price the customer is delighted to pay. Note the word … Continue reading →
Posted in Client's Delight, Dialexica, Task Estimation
|
Tagged Agile software development, civil procedure, Costs, data processors, Discovery, Document review, e-discovery, Electronic discovery, English law, judge, law, Law firm, law firm project manager, law firms, legal technology, legal technology providers, Metadata, mining, outside software, Product Owner, Software project management, Technology/Internet
|
This is the beginning of, and an index to, a series of public critiques of the Socha Gelbman The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM). While it takes a bit of negative energy to describe what is wrong with the EDRM, … Continue reading →
Posted in Agile 5Ps, Dialexica, EDRM critique, Guiding Light, Transition to Agile
|
Tagged agile, Agile Lawyers Association, Agile software development, Collaboration, Discovery, ediscovery, EDRM critique, law school, law schools, lawyer, Legal ethics, legal services, litigation, Litigation Processes, malpractice insurance rates, Mediation, Munich, practices, procedures, processes, Project management, Project Management Institute, Project manager, Re-Engineer, risk management, Scrum, Untrained Project Manager
|
